Wednesday, October 21st, 2009

LINDAAAAA!

Hey, you guys, I've discovered a new vice!  It's old-time radio, preferably horror and thrillers.  They're short, melodramatic, and wonderful: horror hors d'oeuvres, the Gouda-stuffed mushrooms of sinister entertainment.  You know how they call the Miss Marple books and various other British murder mysteries "cozy mayhem"--well, that's what these are, cozy mayhem in an adorable package.  With tasteless advertising for Carter's Little Liver Pills and Camel cigarettes.  They're perfect for the frayed nerves of a student, because all you have to do is listen.  If you're feeling energetic, you can put one on while you're folding the laundry, but if you want to lie down for half an hour, an episode of "Lights Out" is the perfect reason.  You just sit back and enjoy the sounds of Peter Lorre's latest maniac getting ready to murder his wife again.

I've only listened to a few, so far, but there's a vast fund of them here.  You just e-mail them and ask for a password, they send you one, and then you can listen to any of the 500+ shows on their archive.  I can see many enjoyable late-night revels in my future.  The archive features shows with the voice talents of horror actors like Vincent Price, Claude Rains, Bela Lugosi, Margaret Hamilton, Charles Laughton, Peter and Boris, and many others.

The first one I listened to was "Cat Wife", with Boris Karloff and some woman who does a good cat impression.  (It's on the Monster Club website, too, but I first ran across it here; you can hear the whole show without having to sign up for a password.)  At first, I found it ridiculously bad.  Every single element is so predictable you could guess the whole story from one detail, like reconstructing a skeleton from one tibia.  Oh, and it also features some pretty unsubtle acting from Boris--he tears a passion to tatters as if he was Peter Lorre and he'd been directed to do a sobbing M-style breakdown.  His character spends most of the time screaming, "Linda!  NOOO!  LINDA!!!!!" at his monster of a wife (in every possible sense of "monster").  I was so embarrassed that I gave up halfway, blushing hotly.  But, in the usual way, I couldn't get along without knowing what happened at the end, so I went back and finished it and I'm glad I did.  It actually is intended to be funny.  I was relieved; I'd thought they meant the whole thing to be deadly grim and serious, and that I was laughing at something done in earnest.  Whew!  It's okay!  But it's not entirely a laugh, even so.  It's disturbing in a good way: they ring some interesting changes on a much-used theme, and create some weird mental images.  Also, I was kinda flabbergasted by how much sex they could get away with on the radio.  Early on, our hero and his wife are having a screaming fight, in the middle of which she stops and puts the moves on him.  It's actually quite hot, in a worrying way.  I suppose you could get away with more if there wasn't a visual--but that's the thing, radio creates its very own visuals if it's done right.  ...Oh, boy, does it.

Then, the next day, the other students and I all drove over to Stonington to take a walking tour of the historic district.  And one of the girls had her car stereo hooked up to her mp3 player: "You guys, this is my favorite song ever," she said.  It was "What Kind of Cat Are You?"  To top it all off, I went to a swing dance that night, and the DJ's third or fourth dance piece was "Stray Cat Strut".  You know, "I got cat class and I got cat style".  (Here is a video so that you may ogle the band's creative hair.)  I'm haunted by catness... haunted, I tell you, haunted!  At this dance, they had a big water cooler, with paper cups and a marker so that you could personalize your cup and save it for the rest of the evening.  It was fate.  I took a drink of water, then got a marker and wrote "LINDA!!!!!" on my cup.  And went out and padded slinkily round the dance floor.

...Well, I keep amused.

This is perfectly timed for Halloween, I realize, but really I like old-fashioned horror, ghosts, and mayhem at any time of the year.  October is special in part because this is when the rest of the world joins me in my sense of the happily macabre.  On that note, I need to decide on a costume for Halloween.  Here are my options, so far: 

--Ancient Mariner.  Old coat, hat, boots, and work shirt and pants.  Dark circles around eyes.  White plushie albatross suspended from neck, cardboard crossbow.  (Buy plushie albatross at aquarium gift shop.)  Up-side: instant recognition by most people.  Down-side: expensive plushie.

--Edna from Kate Chopin's "The Awakening", which we've been reading in class.  Victorian bathing costume, soaked in seawater.  Up-side: sexy (but almost anything looks sexy compared with the Ancient Mariner).  Down-side: cold.

--Howard Blackburn, maritime disaster survivor, bar-owner in Gloucester, MA, and death-defying adventurer.  Man's suit; fingers taped under hands; pasted-on mustache.  Up-side: drag is funny and cute, plus Blackburn was a real and fascinating person.  Down-side: can't use fingers all evening.

(6 comments | Leave a comment)

Thursday, August 20th, 2009

Globetrotting

I got out my passport today and looked it over.  It's from eight years ago, right before my short time on the Niagara.  As it turned out, I didn't even need it, as I wasn't with the ship when it crossed into Canadian waters and the St. Lawrence River.  I'm glad I got it, though.  Several years after that, in 2004, I went to Scotland.  The only stamp in my passport so far is from the nice security guards at Edinburgh Airport.  This fall, I probably won't need it either, as we're not supposed to cross outside the three-mile line when working aboard ship.  Still, it'll be nice to have it along just in case--and for luck. 

There's my photo on the inner lining.  Beaming all over my face, looking pretty much as I do now, perhaps a little thinner and more carefree and optimistic.  My hair is raked back unflatteringly from my face and the photographer exaggerated the size of my chin.  I do have a big chin, but not as long as all that.  Still, that's me, all right.  It went to Scotland with me, and now it'll go on three college trips with me, and in the future I mean to take it all over the world.  

Getting into W-M made me look twice at other assumptions of mine.  I've been assuming I can never do some really ambitious stuff I want to try, like all that world traveling I told you guys I wanted to do some day.  Up till recently, I've been treating it as a fun pipe dream, speculating vaguely and never actually firming up any plans.  But, you know?  I made this work out, I can make that work out too.  I ought to decide what exactly I want to do and where I want to go, and then set about making it all happen.

Recently, I watched Maltese Falcon.  I posted about that already, come to think of it.  Of course, I loved Peter Lorre as Joel Cairo, even with his hair in ring-a-lets like the girl in the song.  I was still appalled by the stupidity of the villains, though.  What kind of challenge is there for Spade in beating a bunch of weak-minded idiots like those clowns?  No wonder I don't like Spade.  If I'd been writing the script, Mary Astor's character would have Spoilers, I suppose. )I'm telling you, she would have Mary Sued all over the place.  Why didn't they consult me?!  I'd have made her something far better than a cardboard cutout.

Anyway, my point in all this: my favorite moment in the movie might not look like much to anyone else.  When Cairo is unconscious and Sam Spade is going through his stuff, he takes out Cairo's wallet, which is full of money, ID, theater tickets, and miscellaneous odd trinkets.  And a passport.  He pages through it, and you can read over his shoulder if you want to.  I paused the DVD right there.  The passport has a photo of Cairo looking shifty.  Beside it on the information sheet, you can see: "Occupation: Traveler".  The pages are all covered in stamps from all over the place, in various languages and alphabets.  

I loved that.  Joel Cairo may be the Little Henchman that Could, but when I saw that passport I wanted to be him.  I was full of a sudden strong longing to have a life that could fill up a passport.  Now, I'm looking at those empty pages ahead of me, and thinking, "Let's get something down on you."  I've got two years left to go before I need to renew my passport, after all.
(2 comments | Leave a comment)

Wednesday, July 29th, 2009

Some Gothic elements in Cloud

It's hot and humid here in Massachusetts, and the crows are standing around on people's lawns with their beaks open, panting to keep themselves cool.  Time for a little escapism.

At the reading on Monday night, I was talking with [info]nineweaving , and I mentioned that I read her books, most of all, for their plot and the characterization that feeds the plot.  I associate them with Gothic fiction because they give me the same sense of intrigue and enjoyment of strong, bizarre imagery that I get from the kind of novels I refer to as "Gothic".  Nine was a little surprised, and asked me to go into it in more detail, and then something else came up and we both got distracted.  Here's my attempt to explain what I meant more clearly.

If I claim the Cloud cycle as Gothic fiction, first of all I'm going to have to define what I mean by "Gothic".  That's a task that may be beyond me.  All I can say for sure is, "I know it when I see it!"  Here is a list of fiction, in no particular order, that I call Gothic.  Old-dark-house mysteries, family sagas, ghost stories, crime fiction--they all have certain elements in common.
Everyone is invited to add to this list if they feel I've overlooked something. )

I'm going to set down a list of Gothic elements, in no particular order, and see how many correspondences I can find with characters, plots and scenes in the Cloud series.

Comparisons. Cut for massive spoilers for entire Cloud & Ashes series. )

Whew!  And I've only scratched the surface!
One of the fun things about the Cloud series is the number of ways in which you can read it.  I don't mean this entry to say that when you look at Unleaving, you're going to instantly start comparing it to Wuthering Heights.  There is honestly nothing out there that's more than a little like the Cloud series.  I love the series for what it is, not for the ways in which I can compare the stories to other books.  But the comparisons are there, too, at the back of my mind; they just seem so natural that I'd never thought to remark on them before.
(5 comments | Leave a comment)

Monday, July 27th, 2009

I thought we could all use a pantsless Bogart

From [info]classic_film : 



Also, pantsless Cagney here, with bonus sock-suspenders.  You're welcome.

(10 comments | Leave a comment)

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

Edith Piaf: the other pink meat

The second set of French classes are a little more difficult than the first.  Whereas in the introductory session we were all starting out with almost equal inexperience, this time around all the other students have had at least a couple of years of French in school, or they've been speaking a few words of it all their lives.  On the other hand, it makes me really work at my homework assignments, because, hey, I want to keep up.  So far, I'm still fumbling.  But I know I can get better at this, if I devote some time to it every day.  It's nothing like taking a school course; there is no axe hanging over us ready to fall when we take the final, so the only thing making us learn is our own motivation.  And I think I've got enough motivation to learn to speak fluently.  It's fun, like learning a secret code as a child or Morse Code as a grown woman.  Suddenly you have this whole new way to express yourself, and certain people are in the conspiracy with you as you learn.  Perhaps you've had this feeling before, but it's entirely new to me.

I was too harsh about my fellow students in the last class, by the way.  As the last couple of days of 9-to-5 fumbling beginners' French wore on, we actually had a pretty good time together.  One nice thing was that we all went out and got lunch together every day, which more or less forced us to get to know each other.  Unfortunately, none of them are continuing with the intermediate class.  Still, the participants are a rather nice bunch.  

This evening looks like an uneventful one, thankfully.  Earlier today I had a nasty attack of cramps, which doesn't often happen to me.  I'm feeling much better now (in fact I'm at the "skipping through a field of wildflowers in soft focus" stage of recovery) but I'm unusually tired.  

If anybody has recommendations of French-language movies that might help me improve my listening comprehension--or simply be fun to watch--I'd be delighted to hear them.  The subject line comes from a mistake in French class.  Someone mispronounced the title of the Edith Piaf biopic "La Vie En Rose", so it sounded like "La Viand Rose"... well, trust me, it was a hoot at the time.  I've been listening to a little music to help me with my comprehension, too.  All right, what I did first and foremost was find a YouTube clip of the Battle of the Anthems from Casablanca and listen to it over and over.  I know that sung French is different from spoken French, but really, any familiarity is good, this early in the game.  
(2 comments | Leave a comment)

Tuesday, July 14th, 2009

Really fun bad movies: "Passage to Marseille"

Seeing as how it's Bastille Day (and the posh shop downtown has a tasteless poster of a guillotine in its front window), it's a good time to post about Passage to Marseille, that heartwarming WWII movie about a hardy band of Free French ex-convict airmen.  Despite featuring Humphrey Bogart, it's obscure enough that I can't find it for rent anywhere.  I watched it off of YouTube a couple of weeks ago, one night when I couldn't get to sleep.
Teh plotz )

Every bloody trope and cliche that could be rammed into this movie with a shoehorn is present, alive and well.  Right down to the  ||||  ||||  |||| marks on Matrac's cell wall when he's in solitary confinement.  Even the bad lines are kinda fun.  Humphrey Bogart has a sublimely badly-written speech, mumbled to himself as he paces his cell like a wild beast in torment.  It consists of variations on the theme of, "My country is a rathole, the dirty rats sold me out, I hate France, gahhh!", repeated to an absurd degree.  It made me want to write a filk to the tune of that song from "Kiss Me Kate".  Let's see...

I hate France!
Philippe Petain can kiss me on the pants!
It may belong to Germany but it's no longer my land.
They hung me out to dry and packed me off to Devil's Island,
They jumped in bed with fascists, which has made them yet more vile, and
I-I-I-I hay-ay-ay-ate France!

Send help please!
They feed us on baguettes and moldy cheese!
We spend our nights in killing fleas and days in cutting lumber,
We've been dehumanized, I have no name, I have a number,
And worst of all I have to wear a silly stripy jumper,
Oh send help please!

NB: opinions expressed in this short character comedy piece are not necessarily those of the author, who has great respect for the French and owns several stripy pullovers herself.
(8 comments | Leave a comment)

What I wouldn't give for a glass of ice water or a cigarette

Back a few years ago, I vaguely remember saying that I didn't understand the whole concept of smoking.  It didn't make sense to me why someone would take it up in the first place, or, having taken it up, would then keep on smoking (aside from addiction, that is).  

That was then.  Here we are several years later, my life has become an order of magnitude more intense, and coincidentally I've been watching a lot of old movies in which the characters are constantly lighting up.  (As my father says, "Smoking: the easy way to act.")  Practically every guy and a lot of the women are seen inhaling smoke most of the time.  And you know what?  Finally I get the idea.  It's a release.  It's a small, portable version of the way I reflexively go into the kitchen and make tea when I'm feeling overwhelmed.  Never in a million years would I take up smoking, but I wish I had a habit that would take its place.  As someone on here said recently, if they made a cigarette that didn't give you health problems, I would go for it.

Nothing terribly worrying has happened lately, I hasten to add.  I'm just making yet another set of big decisions.  While my body's talking or typing, my mind is sneaking off around the corner to huddle in its trench coat and chain-smoke.

It looks like I'm not going to attend the study-away program at Mystic Seaport this fall.  It's too bad; I was very much interested in going.  But I can't afford it.  I came very close to being able to do it--they accepted me, and I've even been offered scholarship money.  But the only way I could have gone would have been if they pulled out all the stops and gave me a full scholarship.  I'm interested in going, but not when it would make me run myself into umpteen thousands in student loans for one semester.  So that's the end of the story.  I'm disappointed, but not badly, and I feel all right about my decision.  I'll be going to Miskatonic again this fall, and I have to figure out what I'll be taking there.  The bright side is that they have some enticing courses on offer.  The junior-year writing seminar is focused on "America and the Sea", so I'll still be getting my maritime fix.

Also, I can go on working at the bird store this fall, and I'm pretty happy about that, too.  Perhaps Robin will let me pick up more hours.
(6 comments | Leave a comment)

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

Awwwwwwww!

I just walked into the video store to return some overdues, and there at the counter was my favorite video store clerk.  He and I have known each other slightly since I was a teenager, when we once acted in a play together.  Let's call him Georgie, as that was his character in the play.  He's always fun to be around.  I've rather restrained myself from talking about movies with him, though, since, let's face it, he works in the store, so I figure he must have had it up to here with people telling him all about their favorite movies all day long.

Well, I walk in tonight, and there's Georgie at the counter.  He smiles at me and goes, "Hi, Teeny", while he's counting change at the register.

He's wearing a T-shirt with Dr. Gogol on it.

Okay, this would probably not interest anyone but me, but I was delighted.  It wasn't even one of the creepy-looking movie stills.  It was more like this 'un.

I just about went into a tizzy.  We both enthused about how great Mad Love is, and we both went, "Whoa!  The only other person I know who's ever watched that movie!"  He'd been given the shirt by one of their suppliers, and he liked to wear it occasionally, though no one else particularly noted it.  Then I chatted away with him and the lady cashier, talking sixteen to the dozen all about how much I loved Peter Lorre, and all the film noir I'd gotten into watching on account of him, and how I was working my way through all the old black-and-white horror I could find.  Georgie is into quite old horror, it turns out--I would have figured that out long ago if I'd ever taken the time to talk to him about it--and we stood there going, "Oh wow!  How about 'The Walking Dead'!  Have you ever seen 'Dracula's Daughter'?"  It was great. 

Then I came home, watered my cobra lily, fed my white cockatoo, and sat down at the parlor organ to play through Suite For Rainswept Nights And Large Floppy Rubber Bats.

(Leave a comment)

Sunday, July 5th, 2009

By Gad, sir, you are a character, indeed you are

You know what I haven't done often enough?  Mused about gay gangsters, that's what.  Time for a book roundup post.

Lately I've been reading a lot of detective stories (Raymond Chandler, Dashiell Hammett) and hardboiled fiction (The Postman Always Rings Twice: why hello there, disturbing sex scenes, somehow I'd almost forgotten you existed).  This is one of those areas where my tastes have changed since I was a kid.  I can distinctly remember being alternately bored and frustrated by all three authors, but now I like them a lot. 
Spoilers for Maltese Falcon. Gunsel gunsel gunsel gunsel RABBIT RABBIT. )
(Leave a comment)

Monday, June 22nd, 2009

Everything's better with gangsters

I've been reading a lot of hard-boiled fiction lately and watching a few b&w thrillers.  Raymond Chandler and Dashiell Hammett deserve their own post, but here are some of the movies in brief.

Little Caesar

Plot: Rico (Edward G. Robinson) steals stuff, shoots people, and wears increasingly more snappy suits.  Then the cops finally get him. 
Good bits: )
The Big Sleep

Plot: All women everywhere want to make love to Philip Marlowe.  Some people get shot and poisoned.  One of the women is played by Lauren Bacall, who finally succeeds in getting Marlowe's attention.  Everybody smokes a lot.

Good bits: )

And on that front:

Casablanca

Plot: Half the population of Europe are trying to flee the Nazis via Casablanca.  Some of them make it out alive.  All women everywhere, plus Louis, want to make love to Rick.
Good bits: )

Key Largo

Plot: Johnny Rocco the mobster takes over a hotel in the Florida Keys in the off-season and exploits and terrorizes the people there for his own benefit.  Unfortunately for him, one of the people is played by Humphrey Bogart.  There are only two women in the movie, but they both want to make love to Humphrey Bogart.  

Good bits: )

To Have And Have Not

Plot: Humphrey Bogart is awesome and everybody loves him.  Somewhere off in the background, World War II is happening.  Lauren Bacall and Humphrey Bogart smoke at each other and trade brittle, witty banter.  All women everywhere want to make love to Humphrey Bogart, except for the hotel manager's mother, and even she is probably nursing a secret crush.
Good bits: )
(4 comments | Leave a comment)

Friday, June 19th, 2009

Movies: "Crime and Punishment" and "The Man Who Knew Too Much"

We don't have a TV at my place.  If I want to watch a movie, I put it on this computer, or use my parents' laptop if a bunch of us all want to crowd around a screen.  You can't find everything you want on DVD, though.  So I've been having an ongoing midweek film session.  If I have a Wednesday or Thursday with nothing else to do in the early evening, I toddle across town to Arkham Women's College and use one of their viewing rooms to watch an old VHS tape from the video store of something obscure that I can't get on DVD.  (Sometimes, if I feel like living dangerously, I bring a bag of pretzels, even though the sign says No Food or Drink In Library.  What can I say, I enjoy life on the edge.)

Crime and Punishment last week, The Man Who Knew Too Much this week.  The first was more fun, but they both had their moments. 

About The Man..., it didn't really click for me.  I didn't think much of the acting.  The kid was good, though.  They should have given her a lot more screen time.  Most of the good guys seemed weirdly unconvincing; when their daughter has been kidnapped, I don't buy flippant humor and slapstick fight scenes.  If the idea was to keep the overall tone light and exciting rather than to be realistic, I suppose it succeeded at that, but I still didn't quite buy most of the characters most of the time.  It also featured Peter Lorre as a slithy tove.  Spoilers. )

C&P was the 1930s black and white version with Peter Lorre as Raskolnikov, directed by Joseph von Sternberg.  It was outrageously unfaithful to the book.  It was the pulp-fiction thriller version of C&P written by screenwriters who have only read the Cliffs Notes rather than the Dostoyevsky novel.  And it was wonderful.  I raved about it a little the other week, but it's worth saying again: the movie is full of stuff that should have happened in the book.  One of the reasons the book is such a wrench to read is that there keeps being no emotional crisis, no catharsis.  There is this murder, whereafter the murderer can't enjoy himself at all; he was an anxious, miserable young sod before he killed the two women, and afterwards he's still an anxious, miserable young sod.

Not in the movie.  Oh, boy.  In the movie he's a clever and conceited youth with a huge sense of entitlement, who has pictures of Napoleon and Beethoven glowering from his bedroom walls.  (The soundtrack was full of pointless quotations from Beethoven's Fifth.  Like a lot of other stuff in the movie, it was very funny and I don't think it was intended to be funny.  Every time anything of any significance happened, DUH DUH DUH DUMMMM!)  It's amazing what a spot of first-degree murder will do for your inner man.  Raskolnikov gains a sudden bizarre burst of confidence, wherein he marches down to his publisher and demands a better contract, then goes out and gets his sister unengaged to a guy who looks like Pooh-Bah.  If P.G. Wodehouse had written Crime and Punishment, he'd have come up with someone like Lorre-as-Raskolnikov.  I read somewhere that Peter Lorre had always wanted to do a film version of C&P, since he was a fan of the book.  He certainly could have found a screenplay with more literary merit, but he couldn't have found a funnier one.  It's appallingly oversimplified, but it's so charming that I forgave it much.  It's as if he's said, "Screw subtlety and sensitive performances, I did all that in Mad Love and now I'm going for some antiheroic slapstick."  (Oh, and PL has very short hair, unfashionably short for the 30s, brushed straight forward.  I thought, "Hm, this must have been right after Mad Love," and, by gum, I found out afterwards that I was right--he was growing his hair back in just as fast as he could.)  Also spoilers, plus more fangirling. )
(4 comments | Leave a comment)

Thursday, June 18th, 2009

Film yak

--Mystic was great fun.  I got to spend all weekend singing away and making up verses with [info]redcolumbine .  I'm still in denial about its being over, actually.  Fortunately for me, the MIT Chantey Sing is coming up this Sunday (2-5 p.m., as I recall; comment if you want directions).  I can get my fix of good loud choruses in public.  I haven't had nearly enough chances to sing lately, and it's mostly because I haven't taken the trouble to go out and find them.

--Tomorrow I have to go back to work after a week off for the Festival weekend.  Bah.  But on the other hand, on Saturday I may have the time for a kayak trip.  Man, that'd be fun.  

--I bought a cell phone!  After putting it off for some months, I finally did it.  For some reason I can't quite define, I was very reluctant to purchase one.  But it had to be done, and now I'm very glad I've got it.  I won't be using it every day, but as [info]nineweaving  once said, it's like a signal flare, for use in emergencies.  

--Hey, you know what I think I'll buy?  A box of those red highway flares where you stick them upright and light the end to warn away traffic.  If I ever got the car stuck in the mud or had a flat on the highway, they'd be useful for safety.  Plus, bright red sparks are cool.  (My Uncle Alanson was a pyromaniac.  I never met him; he was actually a great-uncle by marriage, and he died of natural causes some years before I was born.  But he had a spectacular reputation on account of once setting fire to a field in back of his house.  His wife and neighbors found him setting the dry grass alight with matches and staring at it with a big, maniacal grin.  "Lannie?  Why are you doing that?"  "Hunh?  Oh, it's fun."  "Hadn't you better stop before it spreads?"  "Uh.  Yeah, I guess so."  He was the nicest, most law-abiding fellow otherwise.  My mother and I both take after him, despite not actually being related by blood.)

--I've been watching a lot of gangster movies lately with my parents.  That's one of the places where we can coincide.  I don't like their modern-day action movies, they hate my monster/horror/supernatural favorites, but these days we all like black-and-white crime movies, gangster flicks, noir in general.  We watched "Little Caesar" the other night, "The Big Sleep" tonight.

--That reminds me.  I've been thinking about film noir.  It's a smashing genre name, isn't it?  Just sounds like a nice portentous phrase to put in the subtitle of your term paper.  It's French, so it must be meaningful.  You can even pluralize it as "films noirs" and astonish your less worldly friends.  And what does it mean?  Hunh?  I ask ya, what's it mean?  I'll tell you what it means.  It means a movie with:

These things:
O Turpitude, where are the charms that felons have seen in thy face? Time's called at the Criminal's Arms, and there isn't a drink in the place. )
Thus we see that a film can be a film noir and yet not actually be good or enjoyable.  (Will the students in the back of the classroom please turn off their cell phones and attend to the lecture.  Thank you.)  A lot of noir films are good and enjoyable, not merely because they contain the elements above but because those elements are used well.  And yet highbrow criticism will have it that any old gangster film is a film noir because it contains those elements, and that therefore (here's the tricky part) its being a film noir makes it automatically good.  All b&w crime thrillers therefore have the opportunity to scoot in under the umbrella of respectability and approval offered by the term "film noir". 

I'm not saying they shouldn't.  What I am saying is that we need terms of highbrow respectability, to shelter other genres we like.  What about early horror?  I ask you.  What about '30s Universal monster movies?  What about movies with big bouncy rubber bats on strings, where the dry ice swirls moodily about the actors' ankles?  What about early silent films where Count Orlak loads twenty coffins onto a cart and then drives away in fast-forward, leaving the audience in inappropriate gales of mirth?  What about films with the same cute little cobbled main street which appeared in about fifteen different monster movies, starting with The Wolf Man?  What about films with a huge, ghastly monster who has been so folk-processed through time that he appears totally innocuous to us today, yet was state of the art for his day?  What about Lon Chaney Jr. covered in yak hair, damn it?  Where is the shelter of artistic merit for films about monsters who look like Bottom the Weaver?  (Sorry, Larry, but you do.)

Wait.  I have it.  We will call classic monster movies film yak. 
(2 comments | Leave a comment)

Monday, June 8th, 2009

He went for a little walk!

     Uberwald... is based on all the classic horror movies you can remember, most particularly those made by Hammer Films, when no coach could go faster than five miles an hour along a suspiciously familiar road without shedding a wheel, half the population were nubile 18-year-old girls and I swear there was one very large, ornate, floor-standing candlestick that appeared in every movie.  In the one-and-sixpenny seats... I must have watched Christopher Lee die in a dozen different ways.  I learned that turning into a heap of wind-blown dust need not put a huge crimp in your life plans. 
     Thus Don'tgonearthe Castle was invented.  It has, of course, running water in the moat, a whole slew of things that could be easily converted into religious objects, and a big window facing the sunrise with insecurely fastened curtains.  It was clear that Dracula was quite a sporting fellow.  It was all a game.
     A world away from the Slasher movies, the Hammer movies were, on recollection, quite domesticated, and as stylized as a mummers' play.  You knew exactly what you were going to get, including the candlestick.  Hammer Horror was
set in Uberwald, where blood is bright red and you don't get too much of it...
--From Terry Pratchett's notes to "The Art of Discworld".

Likewise, an added pleasure for fans of early Universal Horror films is the game of Spot the Prop.  The Universal Studios equivalent of the large floor-standing candlestick is this one satin-covered eiderdown that the props keeper must have liked a lot.  So far it's been seen on Lucy's bed in Dracula and the bed of What's Her Name in The Mummy while she's having flashbacks to ancient Egypt.  Other recycled props include an overstuffed tapestry chair and an overstuffed Edward Van Sloan.  I suppose the poor guy can't help having a boring voice, but he appears in like five different monster movies, and plays pretty much the same Van Helsing-style character in all of them, and he puts me right to sleep.  Oh, well, not all old character actors can be Ernest Thesiger.

Oh, and I watched Mummy last night.  It's exactly like Dracula, except with mummies instead of vampires.  Oh, and it's better than Dracula, because it has Boris Karloff as an umpteenth-level cleric.  I've got a crush on him, now, too.  Well, who am I kidding, I had a crush on him in the Frankenstein movies, but I never realized it till this film.  It's THE VOICE.  Well, it's everything else about him as well, but he has this splendid rumbling voice that makes the floor vibrate when he whispers.  Oh dear me.  This is a man who can switch from modern-speak into an old-fashioned cadence, like the Hindi-speakers in Kipling, with lots of usage of "thee" and "thou", and not sound silly.  This is a man who can walk around in a silly headdress and an ancient Egyptian kilt and still look like a ferocious SOB.  Presence?  Truckloads of it.  He just quietly looms up and pwns everybody else on the screen.

Also, there is a heroine with a little more gumption than the average screaming chick.  She's not as cool as Yvonne from Mad Love, but she is funny and spunky and you can reasonably believe that the men would find her attractive beyond the fact that she's hot.  This is always a problem for me in movies with one token woman whom all the men adore and the monster carries off.  I have a hard time figuring what makes women attractive to men.  Quite often, the Scream Chick doesn't have much personality; she's just sexy, end of story, who cares about anything else.  This makes the men seem pretty shallow, because the story then revolves around their risking their lives for someone who's kinda one-dimensional. 

One of the reasons I liked Mad Love, speaking of which: Yvonne had a lot of charm and character, and the film took care to give her clear motivations for everything she did.  It wasn't obtrusive, it was just a lot of little background stuff.  I felt that I would have liked her if I'd met her socially.  You got to see her talking to her friends, loving her husband, enjoying life, and then trying to hold her marriage together and protect her husband while he was injured and his sanity was heading down the tubes.  The film was her story, more than it was the mad doctor's.  She had a normal life outside the horrors of the plot, and you could see why her husband loved her and why the doctor was obsessed with her.  Things like that are important, and when you see them done right you don't forget them.

On a much shallower front... It's remarkable how little the girl in The Mummy wears, given that it's 1932.  This is the dress in which she spends a lot of time.  And this is her ancient Egyptian outfit.  Hello, Ankh-es-en-Fanservice.  I think the Hays Code was invented for movies like this (and the Theater of Horrors in Mad Love). 

Dialogue that I liked in The Mummy:

Old professor #1: What does the inscription on the lid say, Professor?
Old professor #2: "Death... Death and eternal punishment to anyone who opens this box.  My curse will strike to the Underworld he who breaks the seal, who dares to behold what lies within."
[Miniscule pause]
Eager-beaver graduate student: Well!  Let's see what's inside it!
(6 comments | Leave a comment)

Saturday, June 6th, 2009

How thou'rt translated

The Wolf Man and The Cat People make an oddly appropriate couple as movies go.  I'm not just being cute with the titles, either.  Lots of opinions about <i>The Cat People</i> )

I didn't actually cry over this movie, but my heart has been aching about it for the last few days.  It hurt, but in the very best way, because it got to my own demons.  

From what I hear about the sequel, Curse of the Cat People, it has very little to do with the first movie.  Since everything is deeper with haiku:

Val Lewton's sequel
Has no curse or cat people:
The egg cream of noir.

Oh, and I have all sorts of opinions about The Wolf Man, too.  Tomorrow for those.
(2 comments | Leave a comment)

Tuesday, June 2nd, 2009

The things I watch so that you won't have to

This is a PSA for any fans of black-and-white movies on my f'list.  You will do well to avoid Waterloo Bridge.  I just got through watching it, and that's two hours of my life I won't get back.  IT STANK.  The plot goes like this: 

Sigh... )

Why did I even check out this movie again?  Oh.  Right.  It was the only film besides The Wolf Man to feature Maria Ouspenskaya.  She was incredibly cool, and after Wolf Man I wanted to see what else she'd done.  Well, she was good in this, too.  Unfortunately she plays a vicious-tempered old ballet teacher who has ten total minutes of screen time.  Not worth it at all, even for diehard fans of character actors like Ouspenskaya and C. Aubrey Smith. 
(7 comments | Leave a comment)

Monday, June 1st, 2009

"Merely admiring myself. I am an author." "You look it. Move along."

Oh, right--I promised you Crime and Punishment and zombies, didn't I?  Well, for anyone who was puzzled by my last entry, this is what I meant to address.Spoilers for a book that came out 150 years ago. )

And on a completely different note,  I've been watching excerpts from the 1935 Crime and Punishment with Peter Lorre as Raskolnikov, and it looks... well... bizarre.  The way that a really uneven Film Of The Book can be disturbing and yet fun.  They seem to have packed it down from a long, sprawling moral drama into a short, fast-moving thriller.  The old pawnbroker gets a lengthy scene that makes us hate her--y'know, so we won't feel bad when Raskolnikov gives her the chop.  And I think they try to give Raskolnikov a clearly-defined motivation, give him a lot more fun stuff to do, and generally remake him into the kind of antihero you can laugh and cry with, instead of the depressed young lump of misery from the book.  Of course, he's also played by Peter Lorre, so he has to have a chance to play with people's lapels and invade their personal space.  I'll suspend complete judgment until I've watched the whole film in order, but so far it looks misguided but fun.

You have to watch this one sequence.  If you have ever read Crime and Punishment, please, please watch this.  It's wonderful.  It's so wrong, but I love it so much.  The scene in the book bears no resemblance to this one at all, but, you know?  That doesn't matter.  They ought to have done all this in the book.  It's like Dostoyevsky as played by Harpo and Zeppo Marx.
(2 comments | Leave a comment)

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

Crime and Punishment and zombies

PAWNSHOP HORROR:
STUDENT MURDERS 
OLD LADY WITH AXE
(He had the axe, not the old lady)

Isn't it wonderful having enough time to read just for fun again?  But I thought I ought to read something that would also broaden my mind, so I chose Crime and Punishment.  (Also, admittedly, I want to watch the Peter Lorre movie and I'd feel bogus watching a film of a classic if I hadn't first read the book.)  I think I expected it to be incredibly dull and contain long authorial tracts of no bearing on the plot, kind of the way Notre-Dame de Paris turned out to be very little about Quasimodo and Esmeralda and very much about architectural archaeology.  Then again, Moby-Dick has a very poor ratio of plot to content, and I love it anyway because I enjoy Ishmael's voice and Melville's weird outlook on life in general and the whaling industry in particular.  Such being the case, I was willing to give Crime and Punishment a try.  Oh!  Also, I remembered [info]asakiyume 's recommending it to me once, so I wanted to try and see what she'd seen in it.

Well, I loved it. )
(Leave a comment)

Thursday, May 28th, 2009

We are such gentle people, Sydney.

(pic from here)

My crush on Peter Lorre continues unabated.  Evil, lovable, and funny: three great tastes that taste great together.  This has to be a record--it's been more than a month now, and not only do I still love him, I have yet to see him give a performance I don't like.  Okay, I've only watched five or six movies featuring him, because it's hard to find a lot of his stuff, but that's still a good record.  It's like he's been blessed by Loki.  Hammy?  Yes, sometimes, in the very best way.  Over the top?  Once or twice.  Inappropriately good in the midst of an otherwise lousy cast?  Occasionally.  Dull or uninteresting?  Never.  I could look at him all day. 

I also find old, fat, debauched Lorre just as likable as young, dapper, cute Peter Lorre.  (Yeah, I'm in love.)  The problem is that he isn't in anything good in his later years.  I watched a little bit of "The Raven" on YouTube, and there was a fairly entertaining sequence with him doing the voice of the title character, but it goes downhill from there.  They couldn't think of anything clever to do with him once his character appears in human form, so they just have him stand around and be short.  I don't think I like Roger Corman movies.

Lots about Lorre. )

YouTube has been taunting me with little morsels of all the movies I know I'll have a hard time finding in full.  It's like getting a free sample of the most wonderful old smoked Gouda at the deli, and then never being able to find it for sale anywhere.  This is one that works perfectly well on its own, though.  Peter Lorre and Sydney Greenstreet, fighting on the side of good.  I want a couple of guardian angels like these two.
(6 comments | Leave a comment)

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

With catlike tread, upon our prey we steal

Part two of two posts on M.  This one tends to deal with the stuff I actually did like, though.  
Read more... )
(2 comments | Leave a comment)

Friday, May 22nd, 2009

loldraculas and lolnutjobs

Hi.  I have some free time now.  ph33r me.

Mad Love:


Four more under the cut. )
(4 comments | Leave a comment)
Previous 20